Legal Rights of Union Stewards
In addition to the contractual
rights found in our Industry Wide Agreement, there also exist legal rights
that protect Stewards. The origins of these rights are found in law
(especially the National Labor Relations Act) and in decisions of the
Supreme Court and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
These legal rights include, but are not limited to, a general principle of
equal status with the employer when functioning as Steward; a right to
solicit grievances; and a right to active participation in a Weingarten
setting.
The general principle of equal status with the employer. By its very nature, a Steward’s job requires vigorous advocacy, even confrontation. Confrontation, however, conflicts with the usual rules of employee conduct, which stress obedience to supervisors. (Virtually all arbitrators subscribe to the "obey now - grieve later" rule as it applies to employees.)
If Stewards had to live by these rules, they would be in a hopeless situation. They would be faced with a choice of not being an effective advocate, or risk being disciplined. A recent example involved a supervisor who ordered a Steward not to investigate a possible grievance off the clock, while at the same time, refused to allow time on the clock.
The NLRB and the courts have recognized this problem and have created a special legal status for Stewards when they engage in union business - they are considered to be equals with the employer. This means that conduct which might otherwise result in discipline must be tolerated.
As the NLRB has stated: The relationship at a grievance meeting is not a "master-servant" relationship but a relationship between company advocates on the one side and union advocates on the other side, engaged as equal opposing parties in litigation.
In a similar vein, the US Supreme Court has said the National Labor Relations Act contemplates robust debate and gives a union license to use intemperate, abusive, or insulting language without fear of restraint or penalty if it believes such rhetoric to be an effective means to make its point.
There are two important limits to
the equality principle. First, conduct by a Steward which the NLRB considers
outrageous or indefensible is not protected. Second, the equality principle
only applies when the Steward is acting in an official capacity.
Outrageous or indefensible conduct includes extreme unprovoked profanity,
racial slurs, physical threats, or striking a superintendent.
The equality principle only applies when the Steward is acting in a role as
Steward, i.e., presenting a grievance or requesting information. The
principle does not apply when the Steward is not acting in the capacity of
Steward.
Stewards are not protected if they do any of the following 3 items.
1. Where a Steward is personally abusive to a supervisor
2. Where a Steward disrupts production; and
3. Where a Steward threatens or
assaults a supervisor.
Personal abusiveness. During a closed grievance meeting to discuss Union
matters a Steward possesses a special status. The parties meet as equals and
a Steward has wide latitude in what he does and says.
However, when a grievance meeting or
discussion is not closed, but is observable by other employees - whether in
a grievance meeting or on the workroom floor - a Steward has less immunity
and must not become personally abusive.
2) Disruption of production, A Steward loses immunity status when engaging
in conduct that interferes with the Employer’s right or ability to
operate.
Thus, a Steward is not prohibited from interrupting his own work to talk to a supervisor about a Union related matter. However, such a Steward is in a work duty status; therefore, he must conduct himself in a non-disruptive, professional manner at all times. Furthermore, since he is in a work duty status, he must return to work if instructed to do so by his supervisor.
If he believes the supervisor is violating the contract, or has no authority to order him to return to work, `obey now - grieve later' is the rule.
3) Threats or assaults. Threats of harm, or assaults, or attempted assaults are never protected. A Steward who engages in such activity loses all privileged status, and is subject to immediate discipline.
The right to solicit grievances. There is a common belief among managers that union Stewards may not solicit grievances that they may file grievances only if employees complain and ask them to file. This notion is false. The NLRB has specifically ruled, The solicitation of grievances is a protected activity for stewards as well as other employees.
The right to active participation in a Weingarten setting. The Supreme Court held, in a case known as Weingarten, that an employee who is being questioned by the employer, and who has a reasonable belief that discipline may ensue, has a right to representation prior to answering questions. The right must be invoked by the employee. A Steward has no right to invoke it for the employee. In other words, the employee must request a Steward.
However, once an employee invokes Weingarten, and a Steward is brought in, the Steward has a right to assist and counsel the employee. The Employer sometimes asserts that the Steward may only be a silent witness. This is wrong.
The Steward has the
following rights:
· When the Steward arrives, the
supervisor must inform the Steward of the subject matter of the interview.
· The Steward must be allowed to
take the employee aside for a private pre-interview conference.
· The Steward must be allowed to
speak during the interview.
· The Steward has the right to
request that the supervisor clarify a question so that the employee
understands what is being asked.
· After a question is asked, the
Steward can give advice on how to answer.
· When the questioning ends, the
Steward can provide additional information to the supervisor.
It should be noted that, if the
Weingarten rules are complied with, Stewards do not have the right to tell
workers not to answer questions. Stewards will be most effective if they are
knowledgeable about their legal rights as well as their contractual rights.
When management violates the legal
rights of Stewards, the judicious use of charges against the employer with
the NLRB can be effective in educating management about their legal
responsibilities.